CerebralCheck · sample report
See how a restaurant scan becomes a next step.
This page is a fictional, redacted demonstration of the plain-English report a restaurant owner can review before starting a scan or trial.
Automated scan limitation: this is a starting point, not a guarantee of legal compliance or a substitute for manual review.
Report identity
Redacted restaurant website
- URL
- [redacted]
- Evidence status
- Fictional demonstration
No real restaurant, URL, score, finding, or outcome is shown here. The labels and observations below are representative examples only.
Prioritized fix guidance
Start with what could create the most friction.
A report should make the first review decision obvious. These fictional findings are ordered by priority and pair each detection with the reason it matters and a practical direction for the fix.
- Priority 1HighThe ordering link label does not say where it goes.
Why it matters
A guest using a screen reader or scanning links quickly cannot tell which link starts an order.
Plain-English fix direction
Use a specific label such as "Order pickup and delivery" and confirm that it reaches the intended ordering service.
- Priority 2HighThe example menu path is not clear from the primary navigation.
Why it matters
Guests should not have to search several pages to find the information that helps them decide where and when to eat.
Plain-English fix direction
Put a clearly named menu link in the main navigation and keep it available on small screens.
- Priority 3MediumThe page structure needs one clear main heading and descriptive section headings.
Why it matters
Good heading structure helps people understand the page and move between sections with assistive technology.
Plain-English fix direction
Use one descriptive H1, then organize the menu, hours, location, and ordering content with meaningful headings.
Rendered report
Take the same example with you.
Download a readable PDF containing the fictional identity, prioritized findings, restaurant checks, summary, and the automated-scan limitation.
If generation fails, the control reports that state instead of presenting a false success.
Sample PDF summary
- Example-only report identity and redacted URL
- Priority 1, 2, and 3 findings with explanations
- Plain-English fix direction for each finding
- Menu-findability and ordering-link checks
- Automated scan limitation and report summary
FIT for restaurants
Check the paths guests use most.
Restaurant websites have a few high-intent paths that deserve their own questions. The sample report makes these checks understandable before signup.
Example question: Can a guest reach a clearly named menu from the home page in one obvious step?
Pass direction: the main navigation includes Menu, the link has a descriptive name, and the menu remains findable on a narrow screen.
Fix direction: replace vague labels or buried links with a visible Menu link, then check that the destination opens and is readable.
Example question: Can a guest identify the ordering destination before activating the link?
Pass direction: the link says what it does, such as Order pickup and delivery, and it can be reached and activated with a keyboard.
Fix direction: name the destination plainly, verify the link still works after menu updates, and avoid relying on color or position alone.
Ready for your own first look?
Start with one public restaurant website URL.
The free scan shows what the automated checks can find. If you want regular checks as your menu, hours, and ordering links change, review the trial plans next.
The sample-report campaign source is carried through the scan, signup, pricing, and trial-start flow when browser storage is available. Attribution is best-effort and never blocks signup or checkout.